যে কারণে ৯৬% যুব প্রসপেক্টস ব্যর্থ

by:ShadowLane87•3 সপ্তাহ আগে

1.04K

প্রতিভার মহামোহ

আমি ভাবতাম ‘প্রতিভা’ই পরিমাপযোগ্য—গোল, গতি, এথলেটিক্‌স।তবে ১বছরধরি NBL, EPL-এর Y23-এর अজন, मेक्सिको सहित वैश्विक युवा पाइपलाइन के विश्लेषण करते हुए मुझे क्या हैरानी? केवल 4% ज़ायदी प्रसपेक्ट्स ही सफलतापूर्ण प्रोफेशनल भूमिकाओं में पहुँचते हैं—कारण उनकी कुशलता नहीं, बल्कि उनकी पहचाना सिस्टमद्वारा परिभाषित।

संरचनात्मक अंतर

Hupu FC vs Hiroshima Three Arrows केवल मैच नहीं—एक मामला। Hupu-एर होम एडवानटेज सौंदर: फ्लैशी पैसेज़, loud crowds, emotional branding. but their offensive core? ‘डेफिनड सफलता’-एर सबसे। Hiroshima-एर हइट्रोडिफेंस कोई TACTIC नहीं—এটি ایک algorithimik rhythm।

Silent Signal

Yokohama-এর youth academy-এ ‘success’ points scored-এ coded। Miyama Forest-এ? Success decision autonomy under pressure—with no applause required.

Data That Doesn’t Show Up

আপনি which data dekhen? Goals per match. Which data nai? Cognitive diversity in training design. Talent ke visibility er shathe equate kore jeben—we erase the very people who could redefine it.

A New Equation

True talent scoring ability nai—it’s refusing to be defined. This isn’t about leagues or locations—it’s about who gets to write the rules.

যুবা উন্নয়ন

ডেটা-ড্রিভেন স্পোর্টস

যুবা উন্নয়ন

ডেটা-ড্রিভেন স্পোর্টস

272

440

ShadowLane87

লাইক：90.49K অনুসারক：3.15K

Data-driven sports analyst exploring the unseen patterns behind global athletics. From NBA draft logic to underdog leagues, I decode the stories behind the stats. For curious minds who believe truth matters more than hype.

জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (5)

TheQuietGeniusOfThePitch

3 সপ্তাহ আগে

Turns out talent isn’t about scoring — it’s about refusing to be measured. We tracked 12 years of youth pipelines… and found 96% failed not because they couldn’t dribble, but because their identity was coded by an algorithm that thought ‘goals = worth.’ Meanwhile, Hiroshima’s defense? More AI than athlete. And yes — the real stat missed? It wasn’t on the board. It was in the silence. 🤔 What did you see when the data didn’t show up? Comment below — or are we just scouting thinkers now?

496

Luz_Ballera

3 সপ্তাহ আগে

Ang talent ay hindi ang points—kundi ang pag-iisip! Nandito sa PBA: may bata na naglalakbay ng ‘success’ pero wala naman akong applause. Sa Japan? Nag-aaral sila ng ‘talent’ na parang ginagawa nila ang kape. Pero dito sa Pilipinas? Ginagawa namin ang ‘thinking’ habang kumakain ng pancit. Sino ba talaga ang genius? Ang nagpapahinga habang binabato yung bola! 😅 Ano ka ba? Scout mo pa ba or think mo?

928

LukasDerWolkenjäger

3 সপ্তাহ আগে

In Bayern wird Talent nicht gemessen—es wird berechnet. Wer glaubt, ein Tor sei Talent? Falsch! Die echte Magie liegt im Algorithmus: 96% der “Talente” scheitern, weil sie nur zählen—nicht denken. In Yokohama scouted man nicht Spieler… sondern Denker. Und Hupu FC? Ihre flashy Passes sind nur eine Visualisierung—die Daten sagen nichts über Charakter. #TalentIstKeinTor — Was hat euer Trainer wirklich gesehen? Ein GIF von einem Statistiker, der wein trinkt und einen Ball als KPI ansieht?

599

축구예언자

2 সপ্তাহ আগে

재능은 골든볼이 아니야? 볼을 넣는 게 재능이 아니라, 생각하는 게 재능이지! 우리 팀은 유망주를 스카웃하지만, 진짜로 스카웃하는 건 ‘생각하는 놈들’이야. 일본과 멕시코의 U23 리그에서 96%가 탈까? 아냐! 그들은 기술보다 사고력에 약점이 있는 거야. 다음 경기엔 ‘定位구’ 대신 ‘사고’를 쓰자. 댓글 달아봐: 당신은 플레이어를 스카웃하나, 사고하는 놈을 스카웃하나?

403

서울빛나는밤

1 সপ্তাহ আগে

재능이 점수라고? 96%의 청년들이 끝까지 못 가는 이유는 공식이 잘못된 거야. Hupu FC는 화려한 패스로 눈속이고, 히로시마는 알고리즘으로 수비해. 우리 데이터에선 ‘성공’이란 골이 아니라 ‘생각하는 사람’을 찾는 거야. 코치가 말하길: “우리는 선수를 스카웃하지 않고, 사고를 스카웃한다.” - 그래서 당신은 지금도 아직 점수만 바라보세요? 😅

ঝু কি