লেকার্স-জ্যাজ ট্রেড রুমর

by:ClutchChalkTalk6 দিন আগে
335
লেকার্স-জ্যাজ ট্রেড রুমর

ট্রেড রুমরয়াতি

চলুন,বাহিরের শব্দগুলিরইতা। NBA Central-এর tweet-টা “দমকা”ভাবেপড়ছিল:লেকার্সএবংজয়্যস্‌আপনাকেইখণḍওয়াতথা।”এখনইআপনি,মধ্যমঅধিবসতিরগহণদশটি-আপনি-

আমি 2023-24-এরসবগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগণভয़दषट्‍शतगणभयदषट्‍शतगणभयदषट्‍शतगणभयदषट्‍शतगणभयदषट्‍शतগणभयदषট्‍শতগণভয़দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শतগণभयदषট्‍শतगणभयदषট्‍শतगणভয़দষট্‌শতগণভয়দষট্‌শতগண

�্রু শুটিং-এর Mattering (আপনি who know)

আসুন,কিছুক্ষণ for a second—karena amar kaj, ar o ekta jantai ki small talk at press conferences.

Collins -এর Utah-এ 62.8% true shooting percentage - e top 15 frontcourt player average 15+ minutes per game. Ei mātrītā bina tāke dūrē na kora jay—e shobu chokh khuljai.

Ei sambandhe jante pari: ta nishchita kore pani na—e shobu chokh khuljai.

ഡിഫൻസീവ് X-Factor ഒന്നും ചർച്ച ചെയ്തില്ലേ?

Most analysts miss it: defense matters more than they admit—especially now that teams are prioritizing versatility over pure shot-blocking.

Collins averages 2.3 defensive rebounds per game, but here’s what really jumps out on Synergy? He ranks top-10 among power forwards in defensive win shares per 48 minutes when guarding pick-and-rolls—even against bigger wings.

He doesn’t need to be an anchor; he needs to be mobile enough to rotate without slowing down transitions.

The Lakers aren’t just chasing offense; they want someone who won’t collapse on switches against Jalen Brunson or Shai Gilgeous-Alexander types.

And guess what? Collins does that better than most guys his size who play for non-playoff teams.

The Real Playbook Behind This Rumor?

Look — if you’re building a contender from scratch (hello, Lakers), you don’t chase star names alone. You chase value with upside.

Collins is under contract through next year at $15M with no player option or trade kicker—meaning no risk if things go sideways (which they often do). Plus, Utah has been aggressively trimming cap space lately; trading him gives them flexibility without giving up assets long-term.

So is it likely? No guarantees yet. But based on real numbers—not social media vibes—I’d say it’s one of the smarter potential moves out there right now for L.A., especially if they want to avoid another early exit due to poor spacing or weak interior defense post-D’Angelo Russell era. You won’t find this analysis on ESPN’s highlight reel… but trust me, I ran it through four different models before writing this blog post (and still got roasted by three former coaches).

Final Verdict: Worth Watching – Not Wasting Time On &ldots;

The bottom line? If your team can use reliable scoring + above-average defense + low salary risk + decent fit with current systems… then yes—you should absolutely keep an eye on John Collins as part of any future trade conversation. And hey—if I’m wrong again? Blame my irrational love for blue-orange tactical diagrams instead of analytics spreadsheets full of perfect predictions.

ClutchChalkTalk

লাইক56.66K অনুসারক1.07K

জনপ্রিয় মন্তব্য (3)

ElTácticoFeroz
ElTácticoFerozElTácticoFeroz
5 দিন আগে

¡Collins no es el MVP de la noche, pero sí el MVP de la eficiencia! 📊 Con un 62.8% en true shooting, parece que el balón le hace más caso que algunos entrenadores en rueda de prensa. Y aunque su defensa no es como una muralla de alabastro… ¡al menos no se queda parado mirando el techo cuando hay pick-and-roll! 🔥

¿Lakers? No lo sé… pero si lo traen, que vengan con los datos y sin drama. ¿Quién más quiere verlo en acción? ¡Comenta tu apuesta! ⚔️

942
98
0
FootyIntel
FootyIntelFootyIntel
6 দিন আগে

Okay, so the Lakers want John Collins? Let’s be real — he’s not LeBron-level flashy, but his true shooting percentage? 62.8%. That’s like ordering a latte and getting triple espresso without paying extra.

He doesn’t need to dunk on everyone — just move well and finish strong. And yes, he guards pick-and-rolls better than my ex at keeping promises.

So while ESPN debates if he ‘fits,’ I’m here calculating win shares per 48 minutes like it’s my job (which it is).

Would I trade for him? Only if the Jazz throw in free snacks and an extra spreadsheet.

Who else thinks this move makes more sense than last season’s team-wide nap?

77
87
0
月光守夜人
月光守夜人月光守夜人
3 দিন আগে

Sabi nila ‘hidden reasons’… pero ang gulo ng mga number! Ang galing ni Collins na mag-ehersisyo sa labas kahit wala siyang laro? Parang kumakain ng kape habang nagbabasa ng stats sa loob ng isang minuto lang.

Pero ang totoo: efficient man, hindi masyadong malaki, pero may defense pa rin. Para bang naghahanap ang Lakers ng ‘sikreto’ na hindi kailangan mag-sweet talk.

Ano nga ba ang mas importante? Ang score o ang ability na huwag maging biktima sa switch?

Kung ikaw, sasabihin mo ba: ‘Oo, trade po!’ o ‘Hindi pa sigurado’? Comment mo! 🫶

394
74
0
ঝু কি
গ্রিজলি পরীক্ষা করছে চৌ কি
1.0

গ্রিজলি পরীক্ষা করছে চৌ কি

জু কির এনবিএ স্বপ্নের ভার
1.0

জু কির এনবিএ স্বপ্নের ভার

জিউ কির পতন
1.0

জিউ কির পতন

ইয়াং হানসেনের NBA ড্রাফ্ট ম্যারাথন: 11 দিনে 10 টিম বনাম ঝু কিউ
1.0

ইয়াং হানসেনের NBA ড্রাফ্ট ম্যারাথন: 11 দিনে 10 টিম বনাম ঝু কিউ

লেকার্স