Why Is Yanic Ranked Above Yang Hanshen? The Data Behind Age, Size, and the Hidden Bias in NBA Scouting

The Myth of Physical Metrics

I watched the draft board last year—Yanic, 22, listed above Yang Hanshen, a physically dominant prospect. On paper, it shouldn’t make sense: height differential, frame mismatch, perceived weakness. But basketball doesn’t operate on muscle mass alone. It operates on anticipation.

The Silence Between Perception and Potential

We measure wingspan like it’s gospel. We assume size defines value. But every elite scout I’ve consulted knows better than the eye test. Yang Hanshen had the body—Yanic had the mind. That difference isn’t about athleticism—it’s about spatial awareness under pressure.

The Algorithm Behind Scouting

NCAA is valued because it’s old—but what we’re missing are the signals beneath surface stats: lateral movement efficiency, defensive decision latency, cognitive adaptability under duress. These aren’t trends—they’re patterns.

Who Defines Victory?

The system wasn’t built for stars who score; it was built for players who think three steps ahead—the ones who read defenses before they even touch the ball.

The Real Talent Isn’t What You See

Talent isn’t size. It’s resistance to being defined by metrics that haven’t evolved since 1998.

I write this from Manhattan—not because I’m trying to be radical—but because I’m tired of seeing half-truths as headlines.